Artigos Internacionais
The aim of this paper is to shed some light on the issue of why some BRICS countries are doing much better than others after the international financial crisis. Although these economies share some common economic historical ground, and collectively had been performing much better than the world average in the last decades, their room to maneuver to administrate short-term economic policy to sustain growth in the context of world recession is not similar. Our main assumption is that their different performances can be explained by the degree of their external vulnerabilities, which basically depend on how cautious they were to embrace the liberal policy orientations that became dominant in the 1980s and 1990s with the so-called new macroeconomic consensus.
André Nassif, Carmem Feijo & Eliane Araújo
We present a Kaldor–Thirlwall theoretical and empirical framework on the basic driving forces of the behaviour of productivity and economic...
Leia mais...
Even though the New Macroeconomic Consensus (NMC) guidelines have been under review by mainstream economists from developed countries since the 2008...
Leia mais...
This article analyses changes in the structure and competitiveness of the Brazilian capital goods industry since the early 1990s and proposes a...
Leia mais...
The majority of economic literature tends to discuss economic development issues by analysing the industrial policy and other long-term development...
Leia mais...
The aim of this paper is to shed some light on the issue of why some BRICS countries are doing much better than others after the international...
Leia mais...
The acronym BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China), which later became BRICS with the inclusion of South Africa, was first coined by the Goldman...
Leia mais...
Labor productivity growth in Brazil, after showing positive annual rates between 1950 and 1979, became stagnant after 1980. We decompose, calculate...
Leia mais...
